Brompton Bicycle (Intellectual and industrial property - Patent law - Opinion) [2020] EUECJ C-833/18_O (06 February 2020)
Articles 2 to 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC do not provide for copyright protection of creations whose shape is exclusively dictated by their technical function. To determine if the features of a product's shape are exclusively dictated by technical function, courts must consider all relevant objective factors, including the existence of an earlier patent or design right, the effectiveness of the shape in achieving the technical result, and the intention to achieve that result. The existence of alternative shapes is not relevant if technical function is the only determining factor, but the presence of important non-functional elements freely chosen by the creator may be relevant.
- Citation
- [2020] EUECJ C-833/18_O
- Parties
- Applicant: SI; Applicant: Brompton Bicycle Ltd.; Respondent: Get2Get (Chedech)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Opinion (proposed answer to preliminary questions)
- Legal Topics
- Cumulation of Rights, Copyright Protection of Functional Objects, Originality Requirement, Technical Function and Design, Scope of Copyright in Industrial Products
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SI
Applicant
Brompton Bicycle Ltd.
Applicant
Get2Get (Chedech)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a product whose shape is dictated by technical function can be protected by copyright under EU law
- 2 Criteria for assessing if a shape is exclusively dictated by technical function and thus excluded from copyright protection
Ratio Decidendi
Articles 2 to 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC do not provide for copyright protection of creations whose shape is exclusively dictated by their technical function. To determine if the features of a product's shape are exclusively dictated by technical function, courts must consider all relevant objective factors, including the existence of an earlier patent or design right, the effectiveness of the shape in achieving the technical result, and the intention to achieve that result. The existence of alternative shapes is not relevant if technical function is the only determining factor, but the presence of important non-functional elements freely chosen by the creator may be relevant.
Court Disposition
Opinion (proposed answer to preliminary questions)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment