SILVERI v. ITALY - 44353/98 [2000] ECHR 497 (17 October 2000)

The Court found that there was a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 as the interference with the applicant's property rights was not proportionate to the aim pursued.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2000] ECHR 497
Parties: Applicant: Silveri; Respondent: Italy
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 17 October 2000
Procedural Posture: Application / Judgment
Outcome: violation found
Legal Topics: Right to Property, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

Human Rights Right to Property Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Silveri

Applicant

Italy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant's right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that there was a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 as the interference with the applicant's property rights was not proportionate to the aim pursued.

Court Disposition

violation found

Orders

Italy to pay just satisfaction to the applicant

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.