Simet v Commission (Judgment) French Text [2016] EUECJ T-15/14 (03 March 2016)
The Court held that the compensation to Simet SpA, as notified by the Italian authorities, constituted State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU and was incompatible with the internal market because it did not comply with the requirements of Regulation No 1191/69 or Regulation No 1370/2007, particularly regarding the objective determination of compensation and separation of accounts. The applicant's arguments that the payment was indemnification rather than compensation for public service obligations were rejected based on the reasoning and operative part of the Consiglio di Stato judgment. The applicant retained an interest to act as annulment of the Commission decision could have legal...
- Citation
- [2016] EUECJ T-15/14
- Parties
- Applicant: Simet SpA; Respondent: Commission européenne
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Annulment Action (recours En Annulation) Before the General Court of the European Union / Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- State Aid Compatibility, Compensation for Public Service Obligations, Transport Regulation, Procedural Admissibility, Separation of Accounts, Obligation of Prior Notification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simet SpA
Applicant
Commission européenne
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Annulment Action (recours En Annulation) Before the General Court of the European Union / Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compensation to Simet SpA constituted unlawful State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU
- 2 Whether the compensation was exempt from notification under Regulation (CEE) No 1191/69
- 3 Whether the Commission erred in its assessment of the compensation mechanism and its compliance with EU law
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the compensation to Simet SpA, as notified by the Italian authorities, constituted State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU and was incompatible with the internal market because it did not comply with the requirements of Regulation No 1191/69 or Regulation No 1370/2007, particularly regarding the objective determination of compensation and separation of accounts. The applicant's arguments that the payment was indemnification rather than compensation for public service obligations were rejected based on the reasoning and operative part of the Consiglio di Stato judgment. The applicant retained an interest to act as annulment of the Commission decision could have legal...
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Applicant to bear its own costs and those of the Commission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment