Sokolowski v Poland - 75955/01 [2009] ECHR 2242 (3 December 2009)
The European Court found that the applicant's conviction and sentence for defamation were not necessary in a democratic society, as the statements concerned matters of public interest and the penalty imposed was disproportionate, thus violating Article 10 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 2242
- Parties
- Applicant: Sokolowski; Respondent: Poland
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment and Closure by Committee of Ministers
- Outcome
- Case closed; execution of judgment completed.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Defamation, Criminal Conviction, Just Satisfaction, Execution of ECHR Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sokolowski
Applicant
Poland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment and Closure by Committee of Ministers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's criminal conviction for defamation violated Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was necessary in a democratic society
Ratio Decidendi
The European Court found that the applicant's conviction and sentence for defamation were not necessary in a democratic society, as the statements concerned matters of public interest and the penalty imposed was disproportionate, thus violating Article 10 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Case closed; execution of judgment completed.
Orders
- Payment of EUR 4,000 for pecuniary damage and EUR 4,700 for costs and expenses to the applicant.
- Removal of the applicant's conviction from criminal records.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment