Spyridoula Alexopoulou v Commission of the European Communities. (Officials) [1998] EUECJ T-195/96 (13 February 1998)

Spyridoula Alexopoulou v Commission of the European Communities. (Officials) [1998] EUECJ T-195/96 (13 February 1998)

The Court found that the applicant's claims were manifestly inadmissible or wholly unfounded in law and dismissed the application accordingly.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] EUECJ T-195/96
Parties
Applicant: Spyridoula Alexopoulou; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Staff Case / Order on Admissibility
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Staff Regulations, Admissibility of Claims
European Union Law Employment Law Staff Regulations Admissibility of Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Spyridoula Alexopoulou

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Staff Case / Order on Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's claims are admissible under Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations
  2. 2 Whether the claims are manifestly inadmissible or wholly unfounded in law

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant's claims were manifestly inadmissible or wholly unfounded in law and dismissed the application accordingly.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible or wholly unfounded in law.