B.F. AND OTHERS v SWITZERLAND - 13258/18 (Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations : Court (Third Section)) [2023] ECHR # (04 July 2023)

B.F. AND OTHERS v SWITZERLAND - 13258/18 (Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations : Court (Third Section)) [2023] ECHR # (04 July 2023)

The Court found that while States may require non-reliance on social assistance as a condition for family reunification, this requirement must be applied with sufficient flexibility to avoid making it impossible for refugees to enjoy family life. In three applications, the strict application of the financial independence requirement failed to strike a fair balance between the applicants' right to family life and the public interest, resulting in a violation of Article 8. In one application, the balance was properly struck and no violation was found.

Parties
Applicants: B. F. and Others; Respondent: Swiss Confederation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
04 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment After Full Hearing
Outcome
Violation of Article 8 in three applications; no violation in one application; no breach regarding duration of proceedings in one application.
Legal Topics
Family Reunification, Refugee Rights, Positive Obligations Under Article 8, Margin of Appreciation, Non Reliance on Social Assistance, Discrimination (article 14)
Human Rights Law Immigration Law Family Reunification Refugee Rights Positive Obligations Under Article 8 Margin of Appreciation Non Reliance on Social Assistance Discrimination (article 14)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B. F. and Others

Applicants

Swiss Confederation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment After Full Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the refusal of family reunification to provisionally admitted refugees for not fulfilling the financial independence condition violates Article 8 of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the application of stricter requirements to provisionally admitted refugees compared to those granted asylum constitutes discrimination under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that while States may require non-reliance on social assistance as a condition for family reunification, this requirement must be applied with sufficient flexibility to avoid making it impossible for refugees to enjoy family life. In three applications, the strict application of the financial independence requirement failed to strike a fair balance between the applicants' right to family life and the public interest, resulting in a violation of Article 8. In one application, the balance was properly struck and no violation was found.

Court Disposition

Violation of Article 8 in three applications; no violation in one application; no breach regarding duration of proceedings in one application.

Orders

  • Respondent State to take appropriate measures to remedy the violation (details to be specified in the operative part of the judgment)