Sylka v. Poland (dec.) - 19219/07 - Legal Summary [2014] ECHR 811 (03 June 2014)

Sylka v. Poland (dec.) - 19219/07 - Legal Summary [2014] ECHR 811 (03 June 2014)

The applicant did not suffer a significant disadvantage as a result of the alleged violation because the criminal proceedings were conditionally discontinued, the financial penalty was minor, and there were no objective adverse consequences. The case did not raise an important matter of principle or public interest...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] ECHR 811
Parties
Applicant: Sylka; Respondent: Poland
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
03 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
inadmissible (no significant disadvantage)
Legal Topics
Freedom of Expression, Admissibility Criteria, No Significant Disadvantage
Human Rights Law Freedom of Expression Admissibility Criteria No Significant Disadvantage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sylka

Applicant

Poland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant suffered a significant disadvantage under Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention in relation to an alleged violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression)

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not suffer a significant disadvantage as a result of the alleged violation because the criminal proceedings were conditionally discontinued, the financial penalty was minor, and there were no objective adverse consequences. The case did not raise an important matter of principle or public interest under Article 10.

Court Disposition

inadmissible (no significant disadvantage)