Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et europeens v Commission of the European Communities. (Official) [1994] EUECJ T-565/93 (7 January 1994)

The President found that the conditions for granting interim measures, including urgency and risk of irreparable harm, were not sufficiently established by the applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1994] EUECJ T-565/93
Parties: Applicant: Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction: European Union
Procedural Posture: Application for Interim Measures / Order on Interim Application
Outcome: application for interim measures dismissed
Legal Topics: Interim Measures, Suspension of Operation of a Measure, Staff Cases

European Union Law Administrative Law Interim Measures Suspension of Operation of a Measure Staff Cases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Interim Measures / Order on Interim Application

Legal Issues

1 Whether the operation of a contested measure should be suspended pending the outcome of the main proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The President found that the conditions for granting interim measures, including urgency and risk of irreparable harm, were not sufficiently established by the applicant.

Court Disposition

application for interim measures dismissed

Orders

The application for suspension of the operation of the contested measure is dismissed.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.