TARBASANU v. ROMANIA - 32269/96 [2003] ECHR 79 (11 February 2003)

TARBASANU v. ROMANIA - 32269/96 [2003] ECHR 79 (11 February 2003)

The Court found that the length of the proceedings was excessive and did not satisfy the 'reasonable time' requirement under Article 6 § 1, thus constituting a violation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] ECHR 79
Parties
Applicant: Tarbasanu; Respondent: Romania
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
11 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
Outcome
violation found
Legal Topics
Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings
Human Rights Law Right to a Fair Trial Length of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarbasanu

Applicant

Romania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the length of proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the length of the proceedings was excessive and did not satisfy the 'reasonable time' requirement under Article 6 § 1, thus constituting a violation.

Court Disposition

violation found

Orders

  • The Court found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
  • Romania is to pay the applicant just satisfaction.