Thermenhotel Stoiser Franz Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG & Ors v Commission of the European Communities. (State aid) [2004] EUECJ T-158/99 (13 January 2004)

Thermenhotel Stoiser Franz Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG & Ors v Commission of the European Communities. (State aid) [2004] EUECJ T-158/99 (13 January 2004)

The Court found that the Commission's decision complied with procedural and substantive requirements, including compatibility with the common market, non-discrimination, and adequate reasoning. The applicants' arguments did not demonstrate infringement of rights or misuse of powers.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] EUECJ T-158/99
Parties
Applicant: Thermenhotel Stoiser Franz Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Others; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Application for Annulment / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
State Aid for Regional Purposes, Standing, Statement of Reasons, Compatibility With Common Market, Prohibition of Discrimination, Right of Establishment, Protection of Environment, Misuse of Powers
European Union Law State Aid State Aid for Regional Purposes Standing Statement of Reasons Compatibility With Common Market Prohibition of Discrimination Right of Establishment +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thermenhotel Stoiser Franz Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Others

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Annulment / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Validity of lawyer's signature on application
  2. 2 Standing of applicants
  3. 3 Adequacy of statement of reasons

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Commission's decision complied with procedural and substantive requirements, including compatibility with the common market, non-discrimination, and adequate reasoning. The applicants' arguments did not demonstrate infringement of rights or misuse of powers.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • Applicants shall bear their own costs.