Thomas EULE v Germany - 781/06 [2009] ECHR 547 (10 March 2009)

Thomas EULE v Germany - 781/06 [2009] ECHR 547 (10 March 2009)

The applicant's submissions did not qualify as a succinct statement of an alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, and the materials did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. The application was manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Citation
[2009] ECHR 547
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Eule; Respondent: Germany
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
10 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
application inadmissible
Legal Topics
Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings, Admissibility of Application
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Right to a Fair Trial Length of Proceedings Admissibility of Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Eule

Applicant

Germany

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was violated
  2. 2 Whether the length of the domestic proceedings constituted a violation of Article 6 § 1

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's submissions did not qualify as a succinct statement of an alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, and the materials did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. The application was manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application inadmissible

Orders

  • Application declared inadmissible