Todor SLAVOV & Ors v Bulgaria - 41095/05 [2012] ECHR 881 (10 May 2012)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Todor SLAVOV & Ors v Bulgaria - 41095/05 [2012] ECHR 881 (10 May 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/881.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 881 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 41095/05 Todor SLAVOV and Others against Bulgaria and 6 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 10 May 2012 as a Committee composed of: Päivi Hirvelä, President, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the applications listed in the table below, communicated as part of the group of Slavov and Others and 15 other applications (no. 41095/05 and others). Having regard to the pilot judgment in the cases of Dimitrov and Hamanov v. Bulgaria , nos. 48059/06 and 2708/09, § 133, 10 May 2011, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants are Bulgarian nationals whose names and dates of birth are specified in the table below. Some of the applicants were legally represented. The legal representatives involved were Mr A. Atanasov, Ms G. Chernicherska, Ms S. Stefanova. Mr M. Ekimdzhiev, Ms Z. Doncheva, Mr V. Stoyanov, Ms I. Savova and Mr K. Stanchev. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms R. Nikolova, of the Ministry of Justice. The essential information as to the length of the proceedings in which the applicants were involved is indicated in the attached table. On 18 October 2011 the President of the Fourth Section decided to communicate the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of criminal proceedings and in some cases the complaints under Article 13 concerning the lack of effective remedies in relation to the length. THE LAW The Court considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common legal background. On various dates (see table below) the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Bulgaria in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them various sums, which will cover any and all damage, as well as costs and expenses, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable, to be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the day of payment. The sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. This payment would constitute the final resolution of the cases. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlements are based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reason to justify a continued examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Fatoş Aracı Päivi Hirvelä Deputy Registrar President No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant’s name, year of birth, place of residence Beginning and end of the domestic proceedings Subject matter of domestic proceedings Length of proceedings and instances concerned Communicated complaints Date of applicant friendly settlement declaration Date of Government’s friendly settlement declaration Friendly settlement sums (in euros) 1. 41095/05 28/10/2005 Todor Savov SLAVOV Pudarsko Yanko Aleksandrov YANKOV Striama Angel Andonov MITEV Plovdiv Aleksandrar Asenov CHAKAROV Perushtitsa From: - 14/12/1994 (for the first and fourth applicants) - 24/01/2002 (for the second applicant) - 04/12/2002 (for the third applicant) Until: 03/05/2005 (out of court agreement for all applicants) Criminal proceedings for theft - 10 years and 4 months (one level of jurisdiction) for the first and fourth applicants - 3 years and 2 months (one level of jurisdiction) for the second applicant - 2 years and 4 months (one level of jurisdiction) for the third applicant Only in respect of the first and fourth applicants Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 5 December 2011 29 March 2012 3,250 per applicant 2. 12216/06 13/03/2006 Sasho Nikolov ZAPRYANOV Plovdiv Stefan Asenov ZHIVKOV Plovdiv From: - 14/06/1995 (for the first applicant) - 23/04/1995 (for the second applicant) Until: 23/11/2005 (out of court agreement for both applicants) Criminal proceedings for theft 10 years and 5 months (one level of jurisdiction) for the first applicant 10 years and 7 months (one level of jurisdiction) for the second applicant Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) December 2011 March 2012 3,250 per applicant 3. 21872/06 23/05/2006 Stoilka Georgieva MARKOVA Sliven Beginning of the proceedings : 28/02/1989 (charges against the applicant ) Period starting from: 07/09/ 1992 (ratification of the Convention by Bulgaria) Until: 16/06/2006 (discontinuation of the proceedings) Criminal proceedings for embezzlement 17 years and 3 months, of which 13 years and 9 months within the Court’s competence ratione temporis (two levels of jurisdiction) Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 23 November 2011 29 March 2012 5,500 4. 24521/06 07/06/2006 Manol Zlatanov GOGOV Stryama Rangel Angelov MANOLOV Rakovski Apostol Yankov STEFANOV Momino Selo Beginning of the proceedings : 12 and 15/06/1992 (questionings of the applicants) Period starting from: 07/09/ 1992 ratification of the Convention by Bulgaria Until: 15/12/2005 (out of court agreement) Criminal proceedings for theft 13 years and 6 months, of which 13 years and 3 months within the Court’s competence ratione temporis (one level of jurisdiction) Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 1 December 2011 29 March 2012 2,800 per applicant 5. 33546/06 08/08/2006 Ivan Georgiev GENUROV Pazarzdhik From: June 1996 Until: pending as of 23/11/2006 (applicant ’s last correspondence to the Court) Criminal proceedings for theft years and 5 months until 23/11/2006 (one level of jurisdiction) Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 2 December 2011 29 March 2012 3,500 6. 25154/07 05/06/2007 Iliya Neshev KARANESHEV Plovdiv From: 14/04/1993 Until: 06/12/2006 Criminal proceedings for fraud 13 years and 7 months (one level of jurisdiction) Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) November 2011 March 2012 6,500 7. 44437/07 10/10/2007 Tzvetan Krastev IVANOV Pazardzhik From: 19/03/1997 Until: 03/01/2008 (date of entry into force of the judgment of the Pazardzhik District Court) Criminal proceedings for several thefts years and 9 months (one level of jurisdiction) Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) 7 November 2011 29 March 2012 4,000 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/881.html