Top System (Copyright - Legal protection of computer programs - Opinion) [2021] EUECJ C-13/20_O (10 March 2021)
Article 5(1) of Directive 91/250 permits a lawful acquirer to decompile a computer program where necessary for error correction, provided no contractual provisions prohibit it; decompilation for error correction is not subject to Article 6 requirements but must be limited to what is necessary for correction and within contractual limits.
- Citation
- [2021] EUECJ C-13/20_O
- Parties
- Applicant: Top System SA; Respondent: Belgian State
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Opinion: Article 5(1) permits decompilation for error correction by lawful acquirer, not subject to Article 6 requirements; limited to extent necessary and contractual obligations.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Protection of Computer Programs, Decompilation, Error Correction, Exclusive Rights, Exceptions to Copyright
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Top System SA
Applicant
Belgian State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 5(1) of Directive 91/250 permits a lawful acquirer to decompile a computer program for error correction
- 2 Whether decompilation for error correction is subject to Article 6 requirements
Ratio Decidendi
Article 5(1) of Directive 91/250 permits a lawful acquirer to decompile a computer program where necessary for error correction, provided no contractual provisions prohibit it; decompilation for error correction is not subject to Article 6 requirements but must be limited to what is necessary for correction and within contractual limits.
Court Disposition
Opinion: Article 5(1) permits decompilation for error correction by lawful acquirer, not subject to Article 6 requirements; limited to extent necessary and contractual obligations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment