Neriman BELICE and Others v Turkey - 1372/03 [2009] ECHR 2205 (15 December 2009)

Complaint regarding non-payment of initial expropriation compensation cannot be determined on the basis of the case file and is adjourned; complaints regarding insufficiency of additional compensation and financial loss due to delay are inadmissible due to late filing and lack of damage.

Citation: [2009] ECHR 2205
Parties: Applicants: Neriman Belice and Others; Respondent: Turkey
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 15 December 2009
Procedural Posture: Application to European Court of Human Rights / Partial Decision as to Admissibility
Outcome: Partial admissibility; remainder inadmissible
Legal Topics: Expropriation, Compensation, Admissibility, Delay in Payment

Human Rights Property Law Expropriation Compensation Admissibility Delay in Payment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Neriman Belice and Others

Applicants

Turkey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to European Court of Human Rights / Partial Decision as to Admissibility

Legal Issues

1 Non-payment of initial expropriation compensation
2 Insufficiency of additional expropriation compensation
3 Financial loss due to delay and low interest rates

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Partial admissibility; remainder inadmissible

Orders

Adjourn examination of complaint concerning non-payment of initial expropriation compensation
Declare remainder of application inadmissible