Demir and Baykara v Turkey - 34503/97 [2011] ECHR 2391 (13 December 2011)
The interference with the applicants’ right to form a trade union and to bargain collectively, including the annulment of the collective agreement, was not necessary in a democratic society and constituted a double violation of Article 11 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2011] ECHR 2391
- Parties
- Applicants: Demir and Baykara; Respondent: Turkey
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Supervision by Committee of Ministers
- Outcome
- Case closed; execution of judgment completed.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Association, Right to Form Trade Unions, Collective Bargaining, Civil Servants' Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Demir and Baykara
Applicants
Turkey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Supervision by Committee of Ministers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the annulment of a collective agreement and interference with the right to form a trade union violated Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The interference with the applicants’ right to form a trade union and to bargain collectively, including the annulment of the collective agreement, was not necessary in a democratic society and constituted a double violation of Article 11 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Case closed; execution of judgment completed.
Orders
- Payment of just satisfaction to applicants.
- No further individual measures required as legislative changes have removed restrictions on forming trade unions and collective bargaining for civil servants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment