Zacharias HATZIGEORGIOU and Others v Turkey - 56446/00 [2010] ECHR 1003 (1 June 2010)

Zacharias HATZIGEORGIOU and Others v Turkey - 56446/00 [2010] ECHR 1003 (1 June 2010)

The application was inadmissible because the Court lacked temporal jurisdiction over the 1974 events, the complaints regarding investigation into disappearances were introduced out of time, and the applicants failed to exhaust domestic remedies regarding property and home access.

Citation
[2010] ECHR 1003
Parties
Applicants: Zacharias Hatzigeorgiou and Others; Respondent: Turkey
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
01 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
Application declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Right to Life, Prohibition of Torture, Prohibition of Forced Labour, Right to Liberty and Security, Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Prohibition of Discrimination, Right to Property, Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies, Temporal Jurisdiction, Missing Persons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zacharias Hatzigeorgiou and Others

Applicants

Turkey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the Court has temporal jurisdiction over complaints relating to events in 1974
  2. 2 Whether the applicants complied with the six-month rule for complaints about lack of effective investigation into disappearances
  3. 3 Whether the applicants exhausted domestic remedies regarding property and home access

Ratio Decidendi

The application was inadmissible because the Court lacked temporal jurisdiction over the 1974 events, the complaints regarding investigation into disappearances were introduced out of time, and the applicants failed to exhaust domestic remedies regarding property and home access.

Court Disposition

Application declared inadmissible