YAVOROVENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 25663/02 - Committee Judgment [2014] ECHR 796 (17 July 2014)
The State's failure to enforce final domestic decisions in the applicants' favour within a reasonable time, and the lack of effective domestic remedies for such non-enforcement, violated Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
- Citation
- [2014] ECHR 796
- Parties
- Applicants: Mykola Mykhaylovych Yavorovenko and others (see Appendix); Respondent: Ukraine
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Applications Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment After Joinder of Multiple Applications
- Outcome
- Applications joined; violations found; just satisfaction awarded; partial strike-out for deceased applicant with no successor; inadmissibility for one applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Non Enforcement of Domestic Judgments, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Property, Effective Remedy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mykola Mykhaylovych Yavorovenko and others (see Appendix)
Applicants
Ukraine
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Applications Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment After Joinder of Multiple Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prolonged non-enforcement of final domestic decisions in the applicants' favour violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
- 2 Whether the applicants had an effective domestic remedy as required by Article 13 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The State's failure to enforce final domestic decisions in the applicants' favour within a reasonable time, and the lack of effective domestic remedies for such non-enforcement, violated Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Court Disposition
Applications joined; violations found; just satisfaction awarded; partial strike-out for deceased applicant with no successor; inadmissibility for one applicant.
Orders
- Within three months, the respondent State must enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable.
- The respondent State must pay EUR 2,000 to each applicant (or their estate) listed in the Appendix (except Ms Klavdiya Mykolayivna Galayda and, in application no. 18330/05, only to the first applicant) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax chargeable, converted at the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment