PYSARSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 20397/07 - Committee Judgment [2013] ECHR 569 (20 June 2013)
The State failed to enforce final judicial decisions in due time, violating Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, and failed to provide effective remedies, violating Article 13 of the Convention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] ECHR 569
- Parties
- Applicants: Pysarskyy and Others; Respondent: Ukraine
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- European Court of Human Rights Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Violation found; partial applications struck out; admissible applications joined and allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Enforcement of Judicial Decisions, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to an Effective Remedy, Property Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pysarskyy and Others
Applicants
Ukraine
Respondent
Procedural Posture
European Court of Human Rights Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Lengthy non-enforcement of domestic judicial decisions
- 2 Lack of effective domestic remedies
- 3 Standing of heirs to pursue applications
Ratio Decidendi
The State failed to enforce final judicial decisions in due time, violating Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, and failed to provide effective remedies, violating Article 13 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Violation found; partial applications struck out; admissible applications joined and allowed.
Orders
- Strike out applications in Appendix 1.
- Join and allow applications in Appendix 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment