UL and VM (Order) French Text [2020] EUECJ C-709/18_CO (28 May 2020)
A national court may accept a guilty plea from one defendant for offences allegedly committed jointly with another defendant who pleads not guilty and later adjudicate the second defendant's guilt, provided that any reference to the second defendant is necessary for legal qualification and the order or indictment...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EUECJ C-709/18_CO
- Parties
- Defendant: UL; Defendant: VM; Prosecutor: Úrad špeciálnej prokuratúry Generálnej prokuratúry Slovenskej republiky; Intervener: Government of Slovakia; Intervener: European Commission
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Reference / Final Order
- Outcome
- questions partially admissible; clarified interpretation of EU law; remaining questions inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Presumption of Innocence, Right to Fair Trial, Joint Defendants, Plea Acceptance, Judicial Impartiality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UL
Defendant
VM
Defendant
Úrad špeciálnej prokuratúry Generálnej prokuratúry Slovenskej republiky
Prosecutor
Government of Slovakia
Intervener
European Commission
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Reference / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Does accepting a guilty plea from one co-defendant prejudice the presumption of innocence of another co-defendant who pleads not guilty?
- 2 Are procedural safeguards under Directive (EU) 2016/343 and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU respected in such cases?
- 3 Does mentioning the second defendant in the plea acceptance order violate their rights?
Ratio Decidendi
A national court may accept a guilty plea from one defendant for offences allegedly committed jointly with another defendant who pleads not guilty and later adjudicate the second defendant's guilt, provided that any reference to the second defendant is necessary for legal qualification and the order or indictment clearly states their guilt is not legally established and will be subject to separate proof and judgment.
Court Disposition
questions partially admissible; clarified interpretation of EU law; remaining questions inadmissible
Orders
- Article 3 and Article 4(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 and Articles 47(2) and 48 of the Charter do not preclude accepting a guilty plea from one defendant and subsequently adjudicating the other, provided references to the second defendant are necessary and clearly indicate their guilt is not legally established.
- Second part of the second question and third question declared manifestly inadmissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment