A (Sous-location d'un logement social) (Consumer protection - Obligation of residence and prohibition on subletting the property - Judgment) [2020] EUECJ C-738/19 (10 September 2020)
National courts must assess the degree of interaction between the term at issue and other contract terms when determining unfairness under Directive 93/13/EEC. Significant weight must be given to terms relating to the same breach when evaluating whether a penalty is disproportionately high.
- Citation
- [2020] EUECJ C-738/19
- Parties
- Landlord: A; Tenant: B; Subtenant: C
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Request for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Reference
- Outcome
- Interpretation provided; national court to apply criteria to facts.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract Terms, Penalty Clauses, Social Housing, Directive 93/13/eec
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Landlord
B
Tenant
C
Subtenant
Procedural Posture
Request for Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of point 1(e) of the Annex to Directive 93/13/EEC regarding disproportionately high penalties in consumer contracts
- 2 Assessment of cumulative effect of penalty clauses in consumer contracts
- 3 Relevance of restitution of profits alongside contractual penalties
Ratio Decidendi
National courts must assess the degree of interaction between the term at issue and other contract terms when determining unfairness under Directive 93/13/EEC. Significant weight must be given to terms relating to the same breach when evaluating whether a penalty is disproportionately high.
Court Disposition
Interpretation provided; national court to apply criteria to facts.
Orders
- National court must consider the degree of interaction between penalty clauses and other terms when assessing unfairness under Directive 93/13/EEC.
- Significant weight must be attached to terms relating to the same breach when evaluating disproportionate penalties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment