Dexia Nederland (Consumer protection - Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms - Judgment) [2021] EUECJ C-229/19 (27 January 2021)
A term in a risk-weighted contract fixing in advance the seller’s advantage in the event of premature termination is unfair if, at the time of contract conclusion, it may create a significant imbalance between parties’ rights and obligations, even if the imbalance materializes only under certain circumstances. If such a term is declared void, the seller cannot claim statutory compensation under supplementary national law where the contract can continue without the unfair term.
- Citation
- [2021] EUECJ C-229/19
- Parties
- Seller/supplier: Dexia Nederland BV; Consumer: XXX; Consumer: Z
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Court of Justice of the European Union, Post Referral From National Courts
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; terms fixing advance advantage for seller in event of premature termination may be unfair; statutory compensation under national law not claimable if contract continues without unfair term.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract Terms, Statutory Compensation, Premature Contract Termination, Supplementary National Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dexia Nederland BV
Seller/supplier
XXX
Consumer
Z
Consumer
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Court of Justice of the European Union, Post Referral From National Courts
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contractual term fixing in advance the seller's advantage in the event of premature termination is unfair under Directive 93/13
- 2 Whether a seller can claim statutory compensation under national law after a term is declared void for unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
A term in a risk-weighted contract fixing in advance the seller’s advantage in the event of premature termination is unfair if, at the time of contract conclusion, it may create a significant imbalance between parties’ rights and obligations, even if the imbalance materializes only under certain circumstances. If such a term is declared void, the seller cannot claim statutory compensation under supplementary national law where the contract can continue without the unfair term.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; terms fixing advance advantage for seller in event of premature termination may be unfair; statutory compensation under national law not claimable if contract continues without unfair term.
Orders
- National courts must assess whether terms fixing advance advantage for seller are unfair under Directive 93/13.
- If term is declared void, seller cannot claim statutory compensation under supplementary national law unless contract voidance would penalize consumer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment