Valentina Georgiyevna GEDICH v Russia - 44966/04 [2009] ECHR 2097 (26 November 2009)
The applicant failed to respond to the Court's invitation to submit observations, indicating she no longer wished to pursue the application. No special circumstances required continued examination.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 2097
- Parties
- Applicant: Valentina Georgiyevna Gedich; Respondent: Russian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Decision on Admissibility and Merits
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Valentina Georgiyevna Gedich
Applicant
Russian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision on Admissibility and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
- 2 Whether the applicant intended to pursue the application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to respond to the Court's invitation to submit observations, indicating she no longer wished to pursue the application. No special circumstances required continued examination.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Valentina Georgiyevna GEDICH v Russia - 44966/04 [2009] ECHR 2097 (26 November 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/2097.html Cite as: [2009] ECHR 2097 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 44966/04 by Valentina Georgiyevna GEDICH against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26 November 2009 as a Chamber composed of: Christos Rozakis, President, Nina Vajić, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Giorgio Malinverni, George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 November 2004, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The application was lodged by Ms Valentina Georgiyevna Gedich, a Russian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Irkutsk. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Ms V. Milinchuk, former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights, and subsequently by their Representative, Mr G. Matyushkin . The applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the civil proceedings to which she had been a party was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated February 2009, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 9 December 2008 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No response followed. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue her application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/2097.html