>Viktor Grigoryevich BOGOVIN against Ukraine - 19328/07 [2012] ECHR 1036 (5 June 2012)

>Viktor Grigoryevich BOGOVIN against Ukraine - 19328/07 [2012] ECHR 1036 (5 June 2012)

The Government's acknowledgment of the violation and offer of compensation comparable to Court awards in similar cases, together with the terms of payment, constitute adequate redress. It is no longer justified to continue the examination of the relevant parts of the applications, and respect for human rights does...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] ECHR 1036
Parties
Applicant: Viktor Grigoryevich Bogovin; Applicant: Svetlana Nikolayevna Korneyeva; Applicant: Viktor Kostyantynovych Kozyrkov; Applicant: Valeriy Viktorovych Kislan; Respondent: Ukraine
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
05 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Striking Out
Outcome
Applications joined; struck out in part; remainder declared inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Delayed Enforcement of Judgments, Right to a Fair Trial, Effective Remedy
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Delayed Enforcement of Judgments Right to a Fair Trial Effective Remedy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Viktor Grigoryevich Bogovin

Applicant

Svetlana Nikolayevna Korneyeva

Applicant

Viktor Kostyantynovych Kozyrkov

Applicant

Valeriy Viktorovych Kislan

Applicant

Ukraine

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Striking Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the delayed enforcement of domestic judgments in favour of the applicants violated the European Convention on Human Rights
  2. 2 Whether the Government's unilateral declarations and compensation offers provide adequate redress

Ratio Decidendi

The Government's acknowledgment of the violation and offer of compensation comparable to Court awards in similar cases, together with the terms of payment, constitute adequate redress. It is no longer justified to continue the examination of the relevant parts of the applications, and respect for human rights does not require further examination.

Court Disposition

Applications joined; struck out in part; remainder declared inadmissible.

Orders

  • Applications joined.
  • Applications struck out of the list in so far as they relate to delayed enforcement complaints.