VladimIr SIKA v Slovakia - 48069/06 [2010] ECHR 2173 (7 December 2010)
The applicant failed to respond to requests for information, indicating he no longer wished to pursue the application. There were no special circumstances requiring further examination.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 2173
- Parties
- Applicant: Vladimír Sika; Respondent: Government of the Slovak Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Continuation
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings, Non Discrimination, Striking Out Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vladimír Sika
Applicant
Government of the Slovak Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility and Continuation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
- 2 Whether there was a violation of Article 14 of the Convention
- 3 Whether the applicant intended to pursue the application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to respond to requests for information, indicating he no longer wished to pursue the application. There were no special circumstances requiring further examination.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> VladimIr SIKA v Slovakia - 48069/06 [2010] ECHR 2173 (7 December 2010) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2173.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 2173 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 48069/06 by Vladimír SIKA against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7 December 2010 as a Committee composed of: David Thór Björgvinsson, President, Päivi Hirvelä, Mihai Poalelungi, judges, and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 November 2006, Having regard to the applicant’s failure to reply to the request for information concerning further developments in the proceedings complained of, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The application was lodged by Mr Vladimír Sika, a Slovak national who was born in 1937 and lives in Trnava. The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Pirošíková. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings and also alleged a violation of Article 14 of the Convention. The applicant’s complaint concerning the length of the proceedings was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who also submitted his observations. Before including the case in the list of cases to be examined by the Court, the judge appointed as rapporteur decided that information was required from the applicant concerning further developments in the proceedings complained of. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter of 4 June 2010. By letter dated October 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of the requested information had expired on 2 July 2010 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received this letter on 8 October 2010. However, no response has been received. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Fatoş Aracı David Thór Björgvinsson Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2173.html