Willem Stols v Council of the European Union. (Case T) [2001] EUECJ T-99/97 (11 December 2001)

Willem Stols v Council of the European Union. (Case T) [2001] EUECJ T-99/97 (11 December 2001)

The Court found that the action was inadmissible as it did not meet the procedural requirements set out in the Staff Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] EUECJ T-99/97
Parties
Applicant: Willem Stols; Respondent: Council of the European Union
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Staff Case / Order
Outcome
action dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Staff Regulations, Admissibility of Actions
European Union Law Employment Law Staff Regulations Admissibility of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Willem Stols

Applicant

Council of the European Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Staff Case / Order

  1. 1 Whether the action brought by Willem Stols against the Council of the European Union is admissible under the Staff Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the action was inadmissible as it did not meet the procedural requirements set out in the Staff Regulations.

Court Disposition

action dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
  • No order as to costs.