Wojciech SZYMBORSKI and Jerzy GUZ v Poland - 61069/08 [2010] ECHR 2147 (23 November 2010)
The Court found that the friendly settlement reached between the parties was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, and there were no reasons to justify continued examination of the application. The case was struck out of the list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 2147
- Parties
- Applicant: Wojciech Szymborski; Applicant: Jerzy Guz; Respondent: Government of Poland
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Friendly Settlement, Decision to Strike Out
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wojciech Szymborski
Applicant
Jerzy Guz
Applicant
Government of Poland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Friendly Settlement, Decision to Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of criminal proceedings before the Warszawa-Śródmieście District Court violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the friendly settlement reached between the parties was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, and there were no reasons to justify continued examination of the application. The case was struck out of the list.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Wojciech SZYMBORSKI and Jerzy GUZ v Poland - 61069/08 [2010] ECHR 2147 (23 November 2010) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2147.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 2147 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 61069/08 by Wojciech SZYMBORSKI and Jerzy GUZ against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 November 2010 as a Committee composed of: Ljiljana Mijović, President, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 December 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants, Mr Wojciech Szymborski and Jerzy Guz, are Polish nationals who were born in 1951 and 1947 respectively and live in Warszawa. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. On 23 June 2010 the President of the Fourth Section decided to communicate the applicants’ complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of criminal proceedings before the Warszawa-Śródmieście District Court which commenced on 27 December 2004 and are still pending. THE LAW On 8 September 2010 the Court received the following two declarations from the Government: “ I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Polish Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) to Mr Wojciech Szymborski, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights. This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable and it will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.” “ I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Polish Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) to Mr Jerzy Guz, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights. This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable and it will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.” On 5 October 2010 the Court received the following two declarations signed by the applicants: “ I, Wojciech Szymborski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me the sum of PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights. This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable and it will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. We declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.” “ I, Jerzy Guz, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me the sum of PLN 13,000 (thirteen thousand Polish zlotys) with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights. This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable and it will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. We declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.” The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Fatoş Aracı Ljiljana Mijović Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2147.html