X. v. AUSTRIA - 1918/63 [1963] ECHR 6 (18 December 1963)
The application was inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies, Article 6 procedural rights did not apply to extradition proceedings, and no Convention rights were violated.
- Citation
- [1963] ECHR 6
- Parties
- Applicant: X.; Respondent: Austria
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Application to European Court of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision
- Outcome
- Application declared inadmissible.
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Detention, Right to Legal Assistance, Effective Remedy, Procedural Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Parties
X.
Applicant
Austria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to European Court of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's detention pending extradition violated Article 5 of the Convention
- 2 Whether the extradition proceedings violated Article 6 procedural rights
- 3 Whether the applicant was denied an effective remedy under Article 13
Ratio Decidendi
The application was inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies, Article 6 procedural rights did not apply to extradition proceedings, and no Convention rights were violated.
Court Disposition
Application declared inadmissible.
Orders
- Application rejected under Article 27 paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Convention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment