X. v. THE GERMANY - 2116/64 [1966] ECHR 8 (17 December 1966)

X. v. THE GERMANY - 2116/64 [1966] ECHR 8 (17 December 1966)

The applicant's complaints either do not fall within the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or are manifestly ill-founded; the Commission lacks competence ratione materiae and ratione personae over the subject matter and parties involved.

Citation
[1966] ECHR 8
Parties
Applicant: X.; Respondent: Germany
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
17 December 1966
Procedural Posture
Application to European Commission of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision
Outcome
Application declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Application, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Legal Assistance, Right to Property, Patent Rights, Defamation, Judicial Competence
Human Rights Admissibility of Application Right to a Fair Trial Right to Legal Assistance Right to Property Patent Rights Defamation Judicial Competence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X.

Applicant

Germany

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to European Commission of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's complaints fall within the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's right to a pension or patent rights are protected under the Convention
  3. 3 Whether refusal to provide legal assistance violated Article 6

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's complaints either do not fall within the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or are manifestly ill-founded; the Commission lacks competence ratione materiae and ratione personae over the subject matter and parties involved.

Court Disposition

Application declared inadmissible