X. v. THE GERMANY - 2566/65 [1967] ECHR 25 (06 February 1967)

X. v. THE GERMANY - 2566/65 [1967] ECHR 25 (06 February 1967)

The application was declared manifestly ill-founded as no appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention was disclosed in the applicant's conviction, detention, or the withholding of correspondence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1967] ECHR 25
Parties
Applicant: X.; Respondent: Germany
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
06 February 1967
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Commission of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision
Outcome
application declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Fair Trial, Right to Correspondence, Homosexual Offences, Judicial Review
Criminal Law Human Rights Law Preventive Detention Fair Trial Right to Correspondence Homosexual Offences Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X.

Applicant

Germany

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Commission of Human Rights / Admissibility Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's conviction and preventive detention violated rights under the European Convention on Human Rights
  2. 2 Whether refusal to forward a letter to a witness violated the applicant's rights

Ratio Decidendi

The application was declared manifestly ill-founded as no appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention was disclosed in the applicant's conviction, detention, or the withholding of correspondence.

Court Disposition

application declared inadmissible