ZW v EIB (Rectification order - Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Order) [2021] EUECJ C-50/20P_CO (14 January 2021)

ZW v EIB (Rectification order - Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Order) [2021] EUECJ C-50/20P_CO (14 January 2021)

The application did not seek rectification of clerical mistakes, errors of calculation or obvious inaccuracies, but rather a review of the statement of reasons and legal reasoning, which goes beyond the scope of Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure. Therefore, the application was manifestly inadmissible.

Citation
[2021] EUECJ C-50/20P_CO
Parties
Appellant: ZW; Defendant at First Instance: European Investment Bank (EIB)
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
14 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Rectification Application Dismissed as Manifestly Inadmissible
Outcome
application dismissed as manifestly inadmissible
Legal Topics
Rectification of Judgments, Manifest Inadmissibility, Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
European Union Law Procedural Law Rectification of Judgments Manifest Inadmissibility Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ZW

Appellant

European Investment Bank (EIB)

Defendant at First Instance

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Rectification Application Dismissed as Manifestly Inadmissible

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for rectification satisfied the requirements of Article 154 of the Rules of Procedure
  2. 2 Whether the application sought rectification of clerical mistakes, errors in calculation or obvious inaccuracies

Ratio Decidendi

The application did not seek rectification of clerical mistakes, errors of calculation or obvious inaccuracies, but rather a review of the statement of reasons and legal reasoning, which goes beyond the scope of Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure. Therefore, the application was manifestly inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as manifestly inadmissible

Orders

  • ZW’s application for rectification is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.