Total Petroleum Ghana Limited Vrs Ofori [2023] GHAHC 276 (4 September 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 276
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Commercial / Ruling on Application for Determination of Reserved Price
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Commercial / Ruling on Application for Determination of Reserved Price
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court enhanced the value of the attached property above the forced sale price due to frequent increases in building material costs and prevailing market conditions, exercising its discretion to depart from the expert's valuation with reasons assigned.
Court disposition
Application granted with modification
Orders
- The attached property should not be sold for less than GH¢14,016,200.
02
Material facts
Parties
Total Petroleum Ghana Limited
Plaintiff/applicant Counsel: Irene Davies with Charles Okyere Kwapong holding brief for Kwame Amenanor-TannorJoseph Nana Ofori
Defendant/judgment DebtorClaimant
Claimant Counsel: Kwame Domeh holding brief for Kwame AmoakoAmounts and remedies
- Forced Sale Price of Property: GHS 9,811,340
- Open Market Price of Property: GHS 14,016,200
- Minimum Sale Price Ordered by Court: GHS 14,016,200
03
Procedural history
Posture
Commercial / Ruling on Application for Determination of Reserved Price
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the court should grant the application for determination of the reserved price for the attached property
- 02
Whether the court is bound by the expert valuer's opinion on property value
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant seeks the court's determination and enhancement of the reserved price for the attached property, relying on the valuer's report and prevailing market conditions.
- Respondent
- No affidavit in opposition was filed and the defendant/judgment debtor was absent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
TETTEH AND ANOTHER v HAYFORD (SUBSTITUTED BY) LARBI & DECKER [2012] 1 SCGLR 417
The court is not bound by expert opinion but must assign reasons if it departs from it.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court enhanced the value of the attached property above the forced sale price due to frequent increases in building material costs and prevailing market conditions, exercising its discretion to depart from the expert's valuation with reasons assigned.
Obiter and limits
- Prices of goods and services in the country are now on the increase.
Court disposition
Application granted with modification
- The attached property should not be sold for less than GH¢14,016,200.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL DIVISION, HELD IN ACCRA ON MONDAY THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP FRANCIS OBIRI ‘J’. SUIT NO. CM/RPC/0275/2018
TOTAL PETROLEUM GHANA LIMITED - PLAINTIFF Vs
JOSEPH NANA OFORI - DEFENDANT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RULING --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have listened to the submission for the grant of the application for the determination of the Reserved Price. The Claimant is not a party to the application for the Reserved Price. The motion was served on the judgment debtor on 14th July, 2023 as per the affidavit of service commissioned on 17th July, 2023. There is no affidavit in opposition which has been filed. The Defendant/Judgment Debtor was also served with hearing notice for today’s proceedings on 31st August, 2023 as per the affidavit of service commissioned on 17th July, 2023. He is however absent. I have examined the valuers’ report which is attached as exhibit ‘H’ to the application for the Reserved price. It is dated June 2023. The forced sale price of the property is fixed at GH¢9,811,340.00 and the open market price of the property is fixed at GH¢14,016,200.00. I am however of the view, that considering the frequent increases in building materials in the country, the value of the attached property should be enhanced by the court. It is the law, that the court is not bound by expert opinion, but if the court is to depart from it, the court must assign reason. See: TETTEH AND ANOTHER v HAYFORD (SUBSTITUTED BY) LARBI & DECKER [2012] 1 SCGLR 417 I have already indicated that prices of goods and services in the country are now on the increase. I will therefore enhance the value of the attached property as justice of the case demands. I will grant the application as prayed. I will however order, that the attached property should not be sold for less than GH¢14,016,200. I order accordingly. SGD.
FRANCIS OBIRI (JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT)
COUNSEL
IRENE DAVIES WITH CHARLES OKYERE KWAPONG HOLDING BRIEF FOR KWAME AMENANOR-TANNOR FOR PLAINTIFF/ APPLICANT
KWAME DOMEH HOLDING BRIEF FOR KWAME AMOAKO FOR THE
CLAIMANT
AUTHORITY TETTEH AND ANOTHER v HAYFORD (SUBSTITUTED BY) LARBI & DECKER [2012] 1 SCGLR 417 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.