Sign in
Ghana Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Ghana Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Ghana decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law [2025] GHAHC 106

Ibrahim v Sprint Network Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0165/2019)

Ibrahim v Sprint Network Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0165/2019) [2025] GHAHC 106 (25 July 2025)

Plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that GHS170,200.00 plus GHS2,200.00 remains due from Defendants, who failed to substantiate their claims of further refunds or expenses. Plaintiff is entitled to interest at the prevailing commercial bank rate from August 2018 to date of payment. Claim for general damages is dismissed.

  • Breach of contract
  • Recovery of money paid
  • Interest on sums due
  • Damages
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] GHAHC 109

Richbay Commodity Limited v Zenith Hygiene Systems (GJ/CM/0459/2025)

Richbay Commodity Limited v Zenith Hygiene Systems (GJ/CM/0459/2025) [2025] GHAHC 109 (17 July 2025)

The High Court Commercial Division in Accra entered summary judgment for Richbay Commodity Limited after Zenith Hygiene Systems did not oppose the application.

  • Summary judgment
  • Debt recovery
  • Summary-judgment
  • Debt-recovery
  • Commercial-law
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Contract law [2025] GHAHC 97

Tay v Zonda Tec (Ghana) Limited (CM/RPC/0147/2024)

Tay v Zonda Tec (Ghana) Limited (CM/RPC/0147/2024) [2025] GHAHC 97 (19 June 2025)

The High Court held that a hire-purchase contract existed, the truck was wrongfully repossessed and sold without a court order, and the defendant’s capacity defence failed.

  • Hire purchase
  • Capacity to sue
  • Wrongful repossession
  • Damages
  • Counterclaim
  • Hire-purchase
Read case analysis
Banking law [2025] GHAHC 86

Agricultural Development Bank Plc v Nkansah Gyane Industries (CM/BFS/0078/25)

Agricultural Development Bank Plc v Nkansah Gyane Industries (CM/BFS/0078/25) [2025] GHAHC 86 (2 June 2025)

The High Court in Accra entered a consent judgment after the parties settled a banking dispute. The suit was struck out as settled, with payment terms recorded.

  • Debt recovery
  • Settlement
  • Consent judgment
  • Overdraft facility
  • Letters of credit
  • Consent-judgment
Read case analysis
Commercial law [2025] GHAHC 94

TF Financial Services Limited v Sebef Company Limited and Others (CM/RPC/0438/24)

TF Financial Services Limited v Sebef Company Limited and Others (CM/RPC/0438/24) [2025] GHAHC 94 (23 May 2025)

The High Court entered a consent judgment for TF Financial Services Limited against three defendants for GH¢66,071, payable in monthly instalments, with default interest reserved.

  • Debt recovery
  • Consent judgment
  • Consent-judgment
  • Debt-recovery
  • Commercial-law
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial law [2025] GHAHC 102

TF Financial Services Limited v Sebef Company Limited and Others (CM/RPC/0438/24)

TF Financial Services Limited v Sebef Company Limited and Others (CM/RPC/0438/24) [2025] GHAHC 102 (23 May 2025)

The High Court in Accra entered a consent judgment for TF Financial Services Limited against the first three defendants for GH¢66,071.00, with instalment payments and default terms.

  • Consent judgment
  • Indebtedness
  • Settlement agreement
  • Consent-judgment
  • Debt-recovery
  • Commercial-law
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2025] GHAHC 103

Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018)

Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018) [2025] GHAHC 103 (22 May 2025)

The High Court dismissed an application to amend an entry of judgment after finding the plaintiff had assigned his judgment interest and lacked capacity to apply.

  • Amendment of judgment
  • Assignment of judgment debt
  • Jurisdiction
  • Corporate insolvency
  • Amendment-of-judgment
  • Assignment-of-judgment-debt
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2025] GHAHC 95

Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018)

Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018) [2025] GHAHC 95 (22 May 2025)

The High Court in Accra refused an application to amend an entry of judgment, holding that the plaintiff had assigned his judgment rights and lacked capacity to proceed.

  • Amendment of judgment
  • Assignment of judgment debt
  • Jurisdiction
  • Corporate insolvency
  • Amendment-of-judgment
  • Assignment-of-judgment-debt
Read case analysis
Company law [2025] GHAHC 52

HGS LIMITED VRS. BONSU AND ANOTHER (OCC/40/2022)

HGS LIMITED VRS. BONSU AND ANOTHER (OCC/40/2022) [2025] GHAHC 52 (21 May 2025)

The 1st Defendant, as a director of the Plaintiff, breached his fiduciary duty by placing himself in a conflict of interest position, being a director of both Plaintiff and 2nd Defendant, which supplied the same products to the same customer without disclosure or consent as required by law. However, there was no sufficient evidence that confidential information or trade secrets were used, nor was a cause of action established against the 2nd Defendant. Nominal damages were appropriate as no substantial loss was proven.

  • Fiduciary duties of directors
  • Conflict of interest
  • Corporate governance
  • Use of confidential information
  • Remedies for breach of duty
Read case analysis
Commercial law [2025] GHAHC 93

Vivo Energy Ghana Limited v Hope Capital Limited (CM/RPC/0703/22)

Vivo Energy Ghana Limited v Hope Capital Limited (CM/RPC/0703/22) [2025] GHAHC 93 (21 May 2025)

The High Court in Accra entered judgment for Vivo Energy Ghana Limited after the defendant failed to contest the suit, awarding account relief, damages, and costs.

  • Uncontested suits
  • Account reconciliation
  • General damages
  • Recovery of monies
  • Commercial-law
  • Uncontested-suit
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Ghana decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.