HKSAR v. POON CHUN KIT
- Citation
- HKSAR v. POON CHUN KIT
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 7 August 2007
- Posture
- Application for Certificate Under Section 32(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 / Hearing and Determination of Application for Certificate
- Case number
- CACC56/2006
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 7 August 2007
- Posture
- Application for Certificate Under Section 32(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 / Hearing and Determination of Application for Certificate
- Case number
- CACC56/2006
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court concluded that the statutory threshold for granting a certificate under section 32(2) was not met in respect of the contested point about individual intention for statutory conspiracy and accordingly declined to grant a certificate; the application was refused.
Court disposition
Application for a certificate under section 32(2) refused
Orders
- Certificate not granted under section 32(2) Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
- Application refused
02
Material facts
Parties
Applicant
Applicant Counsel: Mr Peter Chow (instructed by Messrs David Hui & Co.)Respondent
Respondent Counsel: Mr Alex Lee, SADPP, Department of JusticeAmounts and remedies
- Number of Judges: 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Application for Certificate Under Section 32(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484 / Hearing and Determination of Application for Certificate
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether, for the offence of statutory conspiracy under section 159A Crimes Ordinance, the prosecution must prove against each co-conspirator his individual intention to participate in the agreed course of conduct
- 02
Whether the test for granting a certificate under section 32(2) Court of Final Appeal Ordinance is satisfied such that a point of law of great and general importance arises
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant sought a certificate that a point of law of great and general importance arose from the court's earlier decision, specifically whether proof of individual intention of each co-conspirator is required for statutory conspiracy under s159A.
- Respondent
- Respondent, represented by the Department of Justice, opposed the grant of a certificate and argued that the criteria for a certificate were not met and that the point did not amount to one of great and general importance or required determination by the Court of Final Appeal.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484, s.32(2)
A certificate under section 32(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance requires that a point of law of great and general importance was involved in the decision
- 02
Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200, s.159A
The statutory offence of conspiracy is defined and governed by section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court concluded that the statutory threshold for granting a certificate under section 32(2) was not met in respect of the contested point about individual intention for statutory conspiracy and accordingly declined to grant a certificate; the application was refused.
Court disposition
Application for a certificate under section 32(2) refused
- Certificate not granted under section 32(2) Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
- Application refused
Source and reliance status
Court of Appeal · 7 August 2007
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of Appeal
Judgment· 7 August 2007
bjbj nomacro Applicant ____ Before: Hon Stuart-Moore VP, Tang VP and McMahon J Date of Hearing: 7 August 2007 Date of Judgment: 7 August 2007
J U D G M E N T Stuart-Moore, macrobutton nomacro VP (giving the judgment of the Court): This is an application, pursuant to section 32(2) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484, for a certificate that a point of law of great and general importance was involved in the decision which we handed down on 27 April 2007. The point of law, annexed to a notice of motion and affirmation from the applicant, both dated 22 May 2007, reads as follows: Whether or not, for the offence of statutory conspiracy [section 159A Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200], the prosecution is required to prove against each and every co-conspirator his individual intention to participate in the agreed course of conduct. Having considered counsel s general submissions, we decline to grant a certificate and this application is refused. (M. Stuart-Moore) macrobutton nomacro Vice-President macrobutton nomacro Robert Tang ) Vice-President (M.A. McMahon) Judge of the Court of First Instance Mr Alex Lee, SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Mr Peter Chow, instructed by Messrs David Hui & Co., for the macrobutton nomacro Applicant
PAGE -
PAGE -
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K L M 1udk 1udk 1udk i$&`G Normal.dot setup Microsoft Word 9.0 Judiciary Hong Kong Title Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.