N. MANOHARAN, ETC. versus THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER
HWP at Tuticorin is a project/establishment constituted and operating as an adjunct or ancillary of the Department of Atomic Energy (a Central Government department) and is not a separate corporate entity; therefore its employees fall within the exclusionary clause of s.2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (being persons holding posts under the Central Government or governed by rules providing gratuity), and consequently Sections 5 and 14 of the PG Act are not attracted; the appeals are dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellants: N. Manoharan and Others; Respondents: The Administrative Officer and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Civil Appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Section 2(e) Exclusion Clause, Jurisdictional Fact, Status of Heavy Water Plant Vis À Vis Department of Atomic Energy, Interaction Between PG Act and CCS (pension) Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N. Manoharan and Others
Appellants
The Administrative Officer and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether employees of Heavy Water Plant, Tuticorin are covered by Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
- 2 Whether Sections 5 and 14 of the Payment of Gratuity Act are attracted in this case
- 3 Whether HWP is an autonomous industrial establishment or an adjunct/ancillary of the Department of Atomic Energy (a Central Government department)
Ratio Decidendi
HWP at Tuticorin is a project/establishment constituted and operating as an adjunct or ancillary of the Department of Atomic Energy (a Central Government department) and is not a separate corporate entity; therefore its employees fall within the exclusionary clause of s.2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (being persons holding posts under the Central Government or governed by rules providing gratuity), and consequently Sections 5 and 14 of the PG Act are not attracted; the appeals are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Civil Appeals dismissed.
Orders
- Civil Appeals dismissed.
- Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment