D. SUDHAKAR versus STATE OF A.P. & ORS.
Since the present petition raises questions regarding interpretation of Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, the Appointment by Selection Regulations, 1997, the Recruitment Rules, 1954, and the Office Memoranda, and these are interlinked with pending civil appeals, leave is granted and the appeal is tagged for comprehensive adjudication.
- Parties
- Petitioner: D. Sudhakar; Respondents: State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave to Appeal (civil) / Leave Granted and Appeal Tagged With Pending Civil Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (leave granted, appeal tagged for detailed hearing)
- Legal Topics
- Indian Administrative Service Appointment, Reservation for Disabled Persons, Interpretation of Persons With Disabilities Act, Interpretation of Service Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. Sudhakar
Petitioner
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave to Appeal (civil) / Leave Granted and Appeal Tagged With Pending Civil Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reservation for persons with disabilities applies to selection from Non State Civil Services Officers to IAS under Regulations, 1997 and Rules, 1954
- 2 Interpretation of Section 33 of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995
- 3 Effect of Office Memorandum dated 29.12.2005 and OM dated 3.12.2013
Ratio Decidendi
Since the present petition raises questions regarding interpretation of Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, the Appointment by Selection Regulations, 1997, the Recruitment Rules, 1954, and the Office Memoranda, and these are interlinked with pending civil appeals, leave is granted and the appeal is tagged for comprehensive adjudication.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (leave granted, appeal tagged for detailed hearing)
Orders
- Leave granted.
- Appeal tagged with C.A. No. 7295 of 2012 and C.A. No. 11895 of 2014 for comprehensive hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment