Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
India decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Supreme Court held that termination for alleged suppression of criminal antecedents was illegal because the appellant proved bona fide ignorance and the employer acted mechanically.
The Supreme Court held that Section 47 of the PwD Act applied when the respondent was invalidated in 1998, rejected waiver and prospective-notification arguments, and awarded monetary relief.
The Supreme Court set aside a dismissal as disproportionate, held a fresh punishment notice was required after de novo labour-court findings, and sustained the misconduct finding.
The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court could entertain a BSF member’s writ petition under Article 226(1) and that forum non conveniens was misapplied.
The Supreme Court held that temporary status casual labourers were entitled to pensionary benefits on superannuation even without formal regularisation.
The Supreme Court held that similarly situated Work Charged and Muster Roll workers could not be denied regularization under Assam’s 2005 policy merely because they were not appointed against sanctioned posts.
The Supreme Court held that the Visitor, as appointing authority for the First Registrar, could approve termination under the transitional provisions and the General Clauses Act, but left the High Court’s operative directions undisturbed.
The Supreme Court held that a waitlisted candidate already recommended under the old Uttar Pradesh Act could not seek a fresh posting under Section 13(4) after the new Act commenced.
The High Court Division Bench erred by reappreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of fact recorded by the disciplinary, appellate and revisional authorities which were founded on relevant material and, after independent forensic verification by Bihar Police, established that the two identities were the same person; the dismissal was the result of a fair and lawful enquiry and is restored; the Patna District appointment (Order No.10524 of 2007) and the appointment of "Santosh Kumar" as Constable in Bihar are quashed; competent police authorities are directed to examine and take…
Source excerpt
The relevant date for determining eligibility, including educational qualification, is the date of submission of the application; candidates must possess the requisite law degree by that date, and the press note of 29.11.2024 and deletion of the proviso to Rule 12 confirm that candidates appearing in the final year are not eligible.
Source excerpt
Explore more
