D.P. DAS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

D.P. DAS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

In the absence of a governing rule or combined merit list, the only fair, non-fortuitous basis for determining seniority among direct recruits recommended on the same date is their respective age, as provided by the executive instruction of 1946; seniority based on date of interview is fortuitous and inherently unfair.

Parties
Appellant: D.P. Das; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition by High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgement of High Court set aside.
Legal Topics
Seniority Determination, Direct Recruitment, Executive Instructions, Fairness Under Articles 14 and 16
Service Law Seniority Determination Direct Recruitment Executive Instructions Fairness Under Articles 14 and 16

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D.P. Das

Appellant

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition by High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the valid basis for determining inter-se seniority of direct recruits when no specific rule or combined merit list exists?
  2. 2 Whether age or date of interview is the appropriate criterion for fixing seniority among officers recruited on the same date

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of a governing rule or combined merit list, the only fair, non-fortuitous basis for determining seniority among direct recruits recommended on the same date is their respective age, as provided by the executive instruction of 1946; seniority based on date of interview is fortuitous and inherently unfair.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgement of High Court set aside.

Orders

  • Seniority among officers recommended on same date to be determined by age as per office memorandum of 1946.
  • No orders as to costs.