NARINDER KAUR versus PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT & ORS.
No material established that the appellant took undue advantage of the entry of birth date; she applied within the prescribed period and produced an official birth record confirming the correct date of 09.01.1972, which was not disputed. The High Court failed to conduct the mandated inquiry. The appellant is entitled to correction of her date of birth in the service record.
- Parties
- Appellant: Narinder Kaur; Respondents: Punjab & Haryana High Court & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Change of Date of Birth in Service Record, Rules Regarding Date of Birth Correction, Estoppel in Service Matters
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Narinder Kaur
Appellant
Punjab & Haryana High Court & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to correction of date of birth in service record from 26.01.1971 to 09.01.1972 under relevant rules.
Ratio Decidendi
No material established that the appellant took undue advantage of the entry of birth date; she applied within the prescribed period and produced an official birth record confirming the correct date of 09.01.1972, which was not disputed. The High Court failed to conduct the mandated inquiry. The appellant is entitled to correction of her date of birth in the service record.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment dated 20.04.2006 of the High Court in CWP No. 16151 of 2003 set aside.
- Order dated 12.05.2002 of Punjab & Haryana High Court rejecting change of date of birth set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment