RAM NARESH RAWAT versus SRI ASHWINI RAY & ORS.
Petitioners, classified as 'permanent employees' under the Standing Orders, are entitled only to the minimum of the regular pay scale attached to their post; increments and other emoluments are available only after regularisation. Previous wrong extension of increments cannot justify similar relief under Article 14.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ram Naresh Rawat; Respondent: Sri Ashwini Ray & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Order
- Outcome
- Contempt petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employment Classification, Standing Orders, Pay Fixation, Increment Entitlement, Regularisation, Equality Under Constitution (article 14)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Naresh Rawat
Petitioner
Sri Ashwini Ray & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether petitioners, classified as permanent employees, are entitled to pay scales, increments, and emoluments equivalent to regular employees
- 2 Distinction between 'permanent employee' and 'regular employee' under standing orders and statutes
Ratio Decidendi
Petitioners, classified as 'permanent employees' under the Standing Orders, are entitled only to the minimum of the regular pay scale attached to their post; increments and other emoluments are available only after regularisation. Previous wrong extension of increments cannot justify similar relief under Article 14.
Court Disposition
Contempt petitions dismissed
Orders
- Petitioners are entitled to minimum pay-scale attached to their posts but not increments or other emoluments; only regularisation entitles to such benefits.
- No contempt established in fixation of pay at minimum of the scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment