Wilkie v AG [2000] JCA 147 (26 July 2000)
The specific bequest, as interpreted with the saving provision, was not adeemed. The testator intended the entire value attributable to the Guernsey Press shares, including both the Guiton shares and the cash consideration, to pass to the specific legatees. The saving provision was effective to prevent ademption, and the cash consideration formed part of the specific bequest.
- Citation
- [2000] JCA 147
- Parties
- Representor: Geoffrey George Crill; First Respondent: Inawa Marion Paviour-Smith; Second Respondent: Maria Ilda Silva Percy (née Joao); Third Respondent: La Société Jersiaise; Fourth Respondent: La Société Guernsiaise; Fifth Respondent: The National Trust for Jersey; Sixth Respondent: The National Trust for Guernsey; Seventh Respondent/appellant: Jill Kathleen Lee (née Watson); Eighth Respondent/appellant: Margaret Poingdexter (née Amy); Ninth Respondent/appellant: Geraldine Vivian Tomlin (née Yates); Tenth Respondent/appellant: The Master for the time being of Pembroke College, University of Oxford
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 4th April 2000
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ademption of Specific Bequests, Interpretation of Wills, Doctrine of Ademption Under Jersey Law, Substitution of Assets in Testamentary Dispositions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey George Crill
Representor
Inawa Marion Paviour-Smith
First Respondent
Maria Ilda Silva Percy (née Joao)
Second Respondent
La Société Jersiaise
Third Respondent
La Société Guernsiaise
Fourth Respondent
The National Trust for Jersey
Fifth Respondent
The National Trust for Guernsey
Sixth Respondent
Jill Kathleen Lee (née Watson)
Seventh Respondent/appellant
Margaret Poingdexter (née Amy)
Eighth Respondent/appellant
Geraldine Vivian Tomlin (née Yates)
Ninth Respondent/appellant
The Master for the time being of Pembroke College, University of Oxford
Tenth Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 4th April 2000
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cash consideration for Guernsey Press shares formed part of the specific bequest or fell into residue due to ademption
- 2 Whether the saving provision in the will prevented ademption under Jersey law
Ratio Decidendi
The specific bequest, as interpreted with the saving provision, was not adeemed. The testator intended the entire value attributable to the Guernsey Press shares, including both the Guiton shares and the cash consideration, to pass to the specific legatees. The saving provision was effective to prevent ademption, and the cash consideration formed part of the specific bequest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The cash consideration of £1,130,000 in respect of the Guernsey Press shares forms part of the specific bequest and passes to the specific legatees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment