Republic of Brazil v Durant [2012] JCA 025 (27 January 2012)
There was no material change of circumstances between the initial and renewed applications for video-link evidence; further efforts by solicitors did not constitute altered grounds. Affidavit evidence from Dr. Marques could not be admitted without opportunity for cross-examination, as he indicated he was unable to be a witness for the plaintiffs.
- Citation
- [2012] JCA 025
- Parties
- Respondent/plaintiff: The Federal Republic of Brazil; Respondent/plaintiff: The Municipality of Sao Paulo; Applicant/defendant: Durant International Corporation; Applicant/defendant: Kildare Finance Limited; Other: Deutsche Bank International Limited; Other: Deutsche International Custodial Services Limited; Other: Deutsche International Corporate Services Limited; Other: Deutsche International Trustee Services (CI) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Before Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; applications for leave to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Res Judicata, Admission of Affidavit Evidence, Video Link Testimony, Cross Examination Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Federal Republic of Brazil
Respondent/plaintiff
The Municipality of Sao Paulo
Respondent/plaintiff
Durant International Corporation
Applicant/defendant
Kildare Finance Limited
Applicant/defendant
Deutsche Bank International Limited
Other
Deutsche International Custodial Services Limited
Other
Deutsche International Corporate Services Limited
Other
Deutsche International Trustee Services (CI) Limited
Other
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Before Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Royal Court erred in allowing renewed application for video-link evidence after prior dismissal
- 2 Whether the Royal Court erred in permitting affidavit evidence from Dr. Marques without cross-examination
Ratio Decidendi
There was no material change of circumstances between the initial and renewed applications for video-link evidence; further efforts by solicitors did not constitute altered grounds. Affidavit evidence from Dr. Marques could not be admitted without opportunity for cross-examination, as he indicated he was unable to be a witness for the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; applications for leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- Act of Court dated 19 December 2011 recalled insofar as it granted video-link evidence for Sergio Lima Santoro and Vivaldo Alves.
- Decision to allow affidavit of Dr. Silvio Marques as evidence in trial recalled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment