Representation of C and in the matter of Mr D (23 February 2017)
The Will is to be interpreted as a devise to the Representor of the portion of Mr D's immovable property expressed as benefitting E, as the Representor is the only entity capable of holding such property for E and this gives effect to the testator's clear intention.
- Parties
- Representor: C; Deceased/testator: Mr D; Devisee/charity: G; Named Devisee/charity: E; Beneficiary/charity: F
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Representation (probate) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Devise to Charities, Capacity to Hold Immovable Property, Interpretation of Testamentary Intent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Representor
Mr D
Deceased/testator
G
Devisee/charity
E
Named Devisee/charity
F
Beneficiary/charity
Procedural Posture
Representation (probate) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Representor is the intended devisee under the Will for the portion expressed as benefitting E
- 2 Whether E is capable of holding immovable property in Jersey
- 3 Whether the Will can be construed to give effect to the testator's intention despite misdescription of the beneficiary
Ratio Decidendi
The Will is to be interpreted as a devise to the Representor of the portion of Mr D's immovable property expressed as benefitting E, as the Representor is the only entity capable of holding such property for E and this gives effect to the testator's clear intention.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Declaration that the Representor is the intended devisee under the Will for the portion benefitting E and is entitled to hold and give good title to that property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment