Booth -v- The Viscount [2016] JCA 218 (24 November 2016)
The Code of 1771 did not bar the Viscount from returning the claims to the appellant, and the alternative grounds for refusal were irrelevant or unreasonable. The Viscount's discretion must be exercised reasonably, and none of the reasons advanced justified withholding the claims. The appeal is granted and the matter remitted to the Viscount.
- Citation
- [2016] JCA 218
- Parties
- Representor/appellant: Alan Paul Booth; Respondent/respondent: The Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Désastre Proceedings, Assignment of Claims, Judicial Review of Liquidator Decisions, Champerty and Maintenance, Access to Justice, Legal Aid, European Convention on Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Paul Booth
Representor/appellant
The Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Viscount was barred by the Code of 1771 from returning litigation claims to the appellant
- 2 Whether the Viscount's refusal to return the claims was reasonable
- 3 Whether human rights (ECHR) arguments required the return of the claims
Ratio Decidendi
The Code of 1771 did not bar the Viscount from returning the claims to the appellant, and the alternative grounds for refusal were irrelevant or unreasonable. The Viscount's discretion must be exercised reasonably, and none of the reasons advanced justified withholding the claims. The appeal is granted and the matter remitted to the Viscount.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Matter remitted to the Viscount for consideration in light of this judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment