Broere v Mourant & Co (Trustees) Limited [2004] JCA 009 (14 January 2004)
A beneficiary must disclose all relevant documents in their possession, custody, or power, regardless of the capacity in which they are held; the capacity is not a bar to inspection, and any specific objections to inspection must be raised separately.
- Citation
- [2004] JCA 009
- Parties
- Representor/respondent: Jacobus Broere; First Respondent: Mourant & Co (Trustees) Limited; Second Respondent: Fusina Trust Co. Limited; Third Respondent/appellant: Cornelis Broere; Fourth Respondent: Elizabeth Broere; Fifth Respondent: Jacoba (Jacqueline) Broere; Sixth Respondent: Cornelia A. K. Broere
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 22 July 2003
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Trust Documents, Beneficiary Rights, Discovery, Trustee Duties, Conflict of Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacobus Broere
Representor/respondent
Mourant & Co (Trustees) Limited
First Respondent
Fusina Trust Co. Limited
Second Respondent
Cornelis Broere
Third Respondent/appellant
Elizabeth Broere
Fourth Respondent
Jacoba (Jacqueline) Broere
Fifth Respondent
Cornelia A. K. Broere
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 22 July 2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cornelis Broere must disclose documents in his possession regardless of capacity
- 2 Whether the capacity in which documents are held affects their discoverability in trust litigation
- 3 Whether the Royal Court erred in requiring disclosure of documents related to the CB Trust
Ratio Decidendi
A beneficiary must disclose all relevant documents in their possession, custody, or power, regardless of the capacity in which they are held; the capacity is not a bar to inspection, and any specific objections to inspection must be raised separately.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Cornelis Broere must swear a further affidavit within 21 days appending a list of documents including those described in paragraphs 2 and 3 of Part II of Schedule I to CB2 of his affidavit dated 1 May 2003.
- Documents must be listed regardless of the capacity in which they came into possession.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment