Nolan -v- Minerva Trust and Others [2014] JRC 078A (25 March 2014)
The Defendants dishonestly assisted Mr Walsh in breach of trust by failing to make proper inquiries and by facilitating the misapplication of the Plaintiffs' investment funds for purposes unrelated to the intended investments, including for Mr Walsh's personal benefit. The Defendants' conduct went beyond mere negligence and amounted to dishonesty in the circumstances. The Plaintiffs' claims are not barred by prescription.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 078A
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Joan Nolan, Richard Nolan, Seamus Nolan, Patricia Nolan, Ann Nolan, Elizabeth Nolan, Raymond Nolan, John Nolan, Brendan Nolan, Sally Nolan, Oliver Nolan, Kevin Nolan, Noel Nolan, Serene Investments Limited, Bilberry Investments Holdings Limited, Nolan Transport Retirement Benefit Scheme; Defendants: Minerva Trust and Corporate Services Limited (formerly Minerva Financial Services Limited), Michael Cordwell, Peter Nicolle, Stephen Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trusts/fraud/dishonest Assistance / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Dishonest Assistance, Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Quistclose Trust, Breach of Trust, Prescription (limitation), Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joan Nolan, Richard Nolan, Seamus Nolan, Patricia Nolan, Ann Nolan, Elizabeth Nolan, Raymond Nolan, John Nolan, Brendan Nolan, Sally Nolan, Oliver Nolan, Kevin Nolan, Noel Nolan, Serene Investments Limited, Bilberry Investments Holdings Limited, Nolan Transport Retirement Benefit Scheme
Plaintiffs
Minerva Trust and Corporate Services Limited (formerly Minerva Financial Services Limited), Michael Cordwell, Peter Nicolle, Stephen Morgan
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Trusts/fraud/dishonest Assistance / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants dishonestly assisted Mr Walsh in breach of trust regarding the Plaintiffs' investments
- 2 Whether a trust (constructive, Quistclose, or resulting) existed over the Plaintiffs' funds
- 3 Whether the Defendants' conduct amounted to dishonesty or mere negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendants dishonestly assisted Mr Walsh in breach of trust by failing to make proper inquiries and by facilitating the misapplication of the Plaintiffs' investment funds for purposes unrelated to the intended investments, including for Mr Walsh's personal benefit. The Defendants' conduct went beyond mere negligence and amounted to dishonesty in the circumstances. The Plaintiffs' claims are not barred by prescription.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs
Orders
- The Defendants are liable to the Plaintiffs for dishonest assistance in breach of trust.
- The Defendants shall pay the Plaintiffs' losses in the amounts of £5,257,074.25 and €8,398,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment