AG v Ashworth [2002] JRC 24 (25 January 2002)

AG v Ashworth [2002] JRC 24 (25 January 2002)

The sentence was determined by applying Court of Appeal guidance on drug offences, considering the accused's cooperation, guilty plea, youth, and minor previous convictions, resulting in a reduced sentence from the starting point.

Citation
[2002] JRC 24
Parties
Accused: Ashworth; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
25 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashworth

Accused

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of Class A drugs with intent to supply
  2. 2 Consideration of mitigating factors in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was determined by applying Court of Appeal guidance on drug offences, considering the accused's cooperation, guilty plea, youth, and minor previous convictions, resulting in a reduced sentence from the starting point.

Court Disposition

Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment

Orders

  • 3 years' imprisonment
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs