Garnham v PC and Others [2012] JRC 050 (13 March 2012)

Garnham v PC and Others [2012] JRC 050 (13 March 2012)

Given the deadlock among executors, the Court has jurisdiction to resolve the impasse and direct the assignment of the SDL claim to BNP as 99% residuary legatee. The assignment is not unreasonable, particularly as Mrs C (1% legatee) will receive a compensating payment equal to her share of the face value of the loan, and the assignment will not prejudice her financially. The Court's supervisory jurisdiction allows it to direct the exercise of the power to assign in specie in the best interests of the beneficiaries and the efficient administration of the estate.

Citation
[2012] JRC 050
Parties
Representor/applicant, Executor: CG; First Respondent, Executor: PC; Second Respondent, Executor: AC; Fourth Respondent, Executor: LC; Third Respondent, Executor: MC; Sixth Respondent, 1% Residuary Legatee: Mrs C; 99% Residuary Legatee: BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited (BNP)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
13 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Probate/administration of Estate / Application for Directions by Executor Regarding Disputed Estate Asset
Outcome
Application granted. The SDL claim is to be assigned to BNP as 99% residuary legatee, with Mrs C to receive a compensating payment equal to 1% of the face value of the loan.
Legal Topics
Executor Powers and Duties, Assignment of Estate Assets, Deadlock Among Executors, Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction, Distribution in Specie
Trusts and Estates Probate Conflict of Interest Executor Powers and Duties Assignment of Estate Assets Deadlock Among Executors Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Distribution in Specie

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CG

Representor/applicant, Executor

PC

First Respondent, Executor

AC

Second Respondent, Executor

LC

Fourth Respondent, Executor

MC

Third Respondent, Executor

Mrs C

Sixth Respondent, 1% Residuary Legatee

BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited (BNP)

99% Residuary Legatee

Procedural Posture

Probate/administration of Estate / Application for Directions by Executor Regarding Disputed Estate Asset

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the executors should investigate and collect a disputed debt (the SDL claim) or assign it to the 99% residuary legatee (BNP) for investigation and collection
  2. 2 What is the Court's role in resolving deadlock among executors regarding the exercise of a power to assign an asset in specie

Ratio Decidendi

Given the deadlock among executors, the Court has jurisdiction to resolve the impasse and direct the assignment of the SDL claim to BNP as 99% residuary legatee. The assignment is not unreasonable, particularly as Mrs C (1% legatee) will receive a compensating payment equal to her share of the face value of the loan, and the assignment will not prejudice her financially. The Court's supervisory jurisdiction allows it to direct the exercise of the power to assign in specie in the best interests of the beneficiaries and the efficient administration of the estate.

Court Disposition

Application granted. The SDL claim is to be assigned to BNP as 99% residuary legatee, with Mrs C to receive a compensating payment equal to 1% of the face value of the loan.

Orders

  • The SDL claim (the alleged debt owed by SDL to the estate) is to be assigned to BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited as 99% residuary legatee.
  • Mrs C, as 1% residuary legatee, is to receive a payment from the estate equal to 1% of the face value of the SDL loan (approximately £100,000).