Representation of the Z Trusts [2015] JRC 196C (23 September 2015)
The appointment of additional trustees by Madame C was set aside because, in the context of the Z II Trust's insolvency, her fiduciary power to appoint trustees could only be exercised in the interests of all creditors as a class. The evidence showed the appointments were made to benefit the beneficiaries and majority (connected) creditors, not all creditors, and without the consent of all creditors or the Court. This was a misuse of the fiduciary power and contrary to the duties owed in insolvency.
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 196C
- Parties
- Seventh Respondent / Appointor / Beneficiary / Applicant: Madame C; Representor / Trustee of Z II Trust: Volaw Trustee Limited; Original Trustee / Creditor / Respondent: Equity Trust (Jersey) Limited; Sixth Respondent / Proposed Trustee / Creditor: Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA; Proposed Trustee: Pan-European Management (PTC) Limited; Trustee of Z III Trust / Respondent: Barclays Private Bank & Trust Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Representation / Application for Directions / Judgment on Validity of Appointment of Additional Trustees to Z II Trust
- Outcome
- Appointment of Rawlinson & Hunter and Pan-European as trustees of the Z II Trust set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Fiduciary Powers, Appointment of Trustees, Insolvent Trusts, Fraud on a Power, Duties to Creditors Vs Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madame C
Seventh Respondent / Appointor / Beneficiary / Applicant
Volaw Trustee Limited
Representor / Trustee of Z II Trust
Equity Trust (Jersey) Limited
Original Trustee / Creditor / Respondent
Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA
Sixth Respondent / Proposed Trustee / Creditor
Pan-European Management (PTC) Limited
Proposed Trustee
Barclays Private Bank & Trust Limited
Trustee of Z III Trust / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representation / Application for Directions / Judgment on Validity of Appointment of Additional Trustees to Z II Trust
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of additional trustees to the Z II Trust by Madame C was valid in the context of the trust's insolvency
- 2 Whether the power to appoint trustees was exercised in accordance with fiduciary duties owed to creditors of an insolvent trust
Ratio Decidendi
The appointment of additional trustees by Madame C was set aside because, in the context of the Z II Trust's insolvency, her fiduciary power to appoint trustees could only be exercised in the interests of all creditors as a class. The evidence showed the appointments were made to benefit the beneficiaries and majority (connected) creditors, not all creditors, and without the consent of all creditors or the Court. This was a misuse of the fiduciary power and contrary to the duties owed in insolvency.
Court Disposition
Appointment of Rawlinson & Hunter and Pan-European as trustees of the Z II Trust set aside.
Orders
- The appointment by Madame C of Rawlinson & Hunter and Pan-European as trustees of the Z II Trust is set aside.
- Volaw remains trustee of the Z II Trust until further order or agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment