Leeds Utd v Weston and Levi [2011] JCA 221 (22 November 2011)
Leave to appeal is not granted by a single judge where the decision below does not disclose manifest misdirection or satisfy the Glazebrook test; the Royal Court was bound by Court of Appeal precedent and exercised its discretion appropriately.
- Citation
- [2011] JCA 221
- Parties
- Applicant/plaintiff: Leeds United Football Club Limited; First Respondent/first Defendant: Robert Lawrence Weston; Second Respondent/second Defendant: Melvin Stuart Levi
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Single Judge Hearing in Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal not granted by single judge; application referred to full Court of Appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Forum Conveniens, Stay of Proceedings, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leeds United Football Club Limited
Applicant/plaintiff
Robert Lawrence Weston
First Respondent/first Defendant
Melvin Stuart Levi
Second Respondent/second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Single Judge Hearing in Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against an order staying proceedings on grounds of forum conveniens
- 2 Whether the Royal Court misdirected itself in law or failed to consider relevant/irrelevant factors
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is not granted by a single judge where the decision below does not disclose manifest misdirection or satisfy the Glazebrook test; the Royal Court was bound by Court of Appeal precedent and exercised its discretion appropriately.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal not granted by single judge; application referred to full Court of Appeal.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal referred to full Court of Appeal for decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment