Representation of Singh [2008] JRC 120A (30 July 2008)
Mr Nath's letter of resignation was substantially in the form required for renunciation, and the photocopies of the codicils were admissible to probate as the originals were lost but execution was proven by affidavit and compliance with legal formalities was established.
- Citation
- [2008] JRC 120A
- Parties
- Applicants/executors: Representors; Executor (resigned): Mr Ravinder Nath
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Application / Application for Grant of Probate and Admission of Codicil Photocopies
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Grant of Probate, Executor Renunciation, Admission of Copy Codicils
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Representors
Applicants/executors
Mr Ravinder Nath
Executor (resigned)
Procedural Posture
Probate Application / Application for Grant of Probate and Admission of Codicil Photocopies
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a letter of resignation by an executor is sufficient for renunciation under Rule 22 of the Probate (General) Rules
- 2 Whether photocopies of codicils can be admitted to probate in the absence of originals
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Nath's letter of resignation was substantially in the form required for renunciation, and the photocopies of the codicils were admissible to probate as the originals were lost but execution was proven by affidavit and compliance with legal formalities was established.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Grant of probate authorised to the Representors as two of the three executors
- Admission to probate of photocopies of the two additional codicils
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment